Which principle requires a manager to evaluate if a decision is fair for all employees involved?

The Universalist Principle emphasizes that ethical decisions should be universally applicable and should take into account the fair treatment of all individuals. This principle requires managers to evaluate whether their decisions promote fairness and equality for all employees involved. In doing so, it encourages a consistent application of policies and practices, ensuring that no one is unfairly disadvantaged or treated differently based on personal characteristics.

This principle aligns with the broader values of justice and respect for individuals, mandating that managers consider the implications of their decisions on every employee. The focus on fairness means that the manager must think critically about how their choices impact all members of the team, fostering an environment of trust and integrity within the organization.

The other options, while related to ethical decision-making, do not specifically focus on the evaluation of fairness towards all involved parties as distinctly as the Universalist Principle does. For instance, the Utilitarian Principle emphasizes the greatest good for the greatest number, which may not necessarily ensure fairness for all individuals. The Freedman Principle is not widely recognized in ethical frameworks, while the Social Justice Principle, although it deals with fairness, is more focused on societal factors rather than the managerial context of individual employee situations.