When a manager thinks of someone they truly admire to guide their decisions, which principle are they following?

The principle of universalism is centered around the idea that certain ethical standards apply universally to all individuals, regardless of the situation. When a manager thinks of someone they admire to guide their decisions, they often seek to emulate the values, ethics, and behaviors of that individual. This reflects a commitment to principles that are believed to be universally applicable, promoting actions that uphold these values in various contexts.

In this scenario, the manager is not merely considering the outcomes of their decisions (as with the utilitarian or consequentialist principles) but is looking for guidance that aligns with consistent moral standards that apply to everyone. This approach indicates a belief that the same ethical considerations should be upheld universally, no matter the specific circumstances surrounding their decisions.

In contrast, other principles focus more on outcomes or context-specific duties rather than a consistent application of values across different situations. Thus, the choice of the universalist principle aptly captures the essence of seeking inspiration from a figure admired for their ethical stance and the intent to apply similar standards in one’s own decision-making.